Guides to measuring and validating procurement savings
Short, sourced articles on the method behind procurement savings recognition.
The full method
The reference page: locked baseline, hard vs avoidance, in-year vs run-rate, FX, finance validation.
6 min read
How to calculate procurement savings and get them validated
Six steps from a negotiation to a savings figure finance accepts, with the worked example of a three-buyer team.
Read the article4 min read
Procurement savings tracker Excel template
A free Excel file to track initiatives and savings, with in-year impact and run-rate calculated. Its columns are those of the tool's import.
Read the article5 min read
Why a savings baseline must lock
A saving only means something relative to a baseline. If that baseline can move after the fact, the final number means nothing.
Read the article5 min read
Who validates procurement savings: finance
As long as procurement both reports and measures its own savings, the number stays contestable. Finance validation removes the doubt.
Read the article5 min read
Cost avoidance vs cost savings: why avoidance is not a P&L saving
A hard saving reduces real spend. Cost avoidance prevents an increase. Mixing them strips your reporting of all credibility.
Read the article5 min read
Recurring vs one-time savings: in-year impact and run-rate
A saving landed mid-year does not deliver a full year of impact in year one. Confusing run-rate with in-year impact misleads the budget.
Read the article